Mẹo Legitimacy in the end states means that the results of a military operation will be just.
Thủ Thuật Hướng dẫn Legitimacy in the end states means that the results of a military operation will be just. Mới Nhất
Lê Mạnh Hùng đang tìm kiếm từ khóa Legitimacy in the end states means that the results of a military operation will be just. được Update vào lúc : 2022-10-29 08:36:05 . Với phương châm chia sẻ Kinh Nghiệm Hướng dẫn trong nội dung bài viết một cách Chi Tiết 2022. Nếu sau khi Read tài liệu vẫn ko hiểu thì hoàn toàn có thể lại Comments ở cuối bài để Tác giả lý giải và hướng dẫn lại nha.Abstract
The idea that the legitimacy of international institutions affects state behavior is increasingly common in discussions of international relations, and yet little has been said about what the term legitimacy means or how it works. This is peculiar, since legitimacy is widely cited in domestic social studies as a major reason, along with coercion and self-interest, that actors obey rules. I examine the concept of legitimacy, defined as the internalization of an external rule, as it is used in domestic studies and in international relations, and find that the existence of institutions that states accept as legitimate has important implications for theories of international relations. Using the norms of sovereign nonintervention as an illustration, I compare coercion, self-interest, and legitimacy as three motivations for rule-following by states. Self-interest and coercion, alone or together, are insufficient to sustain the pattern of behavior we recognize as the system of sovereign states. The degree of settledness of borders, especially among states of unequal power, indicates that the institution of sovereignty owes part of its persistence to the widespread acceptance by states of the norms of sovereignty as legitimate. This is important for international relations because the existence of legitimate rules signals the presence of authority, which is inconsistent with the received image of the international system as anarchic. I conclude the article by charting a course of further research into the ideas of legitimacy, authority, and anarchy.
Nội dung chính Show- Which statement best describes the authority of the president has in time of war or national emergency?Which statement best describes the limitation of tactical control Tacon )?When a disaster strikes which agency or entity may assume the role?Which statement describes what correct decision on the use of force require?
Journal Information
International Organization is a leading peer-reviewed journal that covers the entire field of international affairs. Subject areas include: foreign policies, international relations, international and comparative political economy, security policies, environmental disputes and resolutions, European integration, alliance patterns and war, bargaining and conflict resolution, economic development and adjustment, and international capital movements. Guidelines for Contributors Cambridge Journals Online
Publisher Information
Among the largest university presses in the world, The MIT Press publishes over 200 new books each year along with 30 journals in the arts and humanities, economics, international affairs, history, political science, science and technology along with other disciplines. We were among the first university presses to offer titles electronically and we continue to adopt technologies that allow us to better support the scholarly mission and disseminate our content widely. The Press's enthusiasm for innovation is reflected in our continuing exploration of this frontier. Since the late 1960s, we have experimented with generation after generation of electronic publishing tools. Through our commitment to new products—whether digital journals or entirely new forms of communication—we have continued to look for the most efficient and effective means to serve our readership. Our readers have come to expect excellence from our products, and they can count on us to maintain a commitment to producing rigorous and innovative information products in whatever forms the future of publishing may bring.
Rights & Usage
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
International Organization © 1999
Cambridge University Press
Request Permissions
Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for không lấy phí.
Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in
journal article
Kill, Capture ... or Neutralize? How Operational Planning Changes the Language of Communicating WarJournal of Information Warfare
Vol. 13, No. 1 (2014)
, pp. 72-86 (15 pages)
Published By: Peregrine Technical Solutions
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26487012
Read and tải về
Log in through your school or library
Read Online
Read 100 articles/month không lấy phí
Abstract
The doctrine of warfare influences the way language is used. The reporting of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrate that the effects-centric doctrines have started to transform the grammatical and lexical patterning of discourse. During the war in Iraq, both military experts and linguists have criticized the language of the Effects-Based Operations as complex and confusing. This article provides a cross-disciplinary perspective of the study of war discourses by discussing the linguistic characteristics of 21st century Strategic Communication as a reflection of current military doctrine and operation planning. The analysis suggests that the perceived complexity is a consequence of Effects-thinking, which has introduced the taxonomy of Effects into discourse, where they have begun to replace Action descriptions in clauses. The resulting abstract descriptions of strategy, operational art, and tactics means the information value of the clause becomes impaired. The analysis also suggests that this marks the birth of a new genre in war discourse.
Journal Information
Dr. Bill Hutchinson founded the Journal of Information Warfare 15 years ago, and the staff of the JIW wanted to bring him back so that this publication could focus on its original intent – namely to deliver high quality, highly technical papers on cutting edge IW and Cyber Warfare topics. This will be done by linking closely with the academic IW conferences, to deliver new and exciting articles for publication in the JIW. Dr Armistead received his PhD in IW and has written three books.
Publisher Information
Peregrine Technical Solutions LLC (Peregrine) is a small disadvantaged business, 8(a), Alaska Native Corporation (ANC), operating with a primary NAICS code of 541513, under the three-year size standard under $27.5M. Our CAGE Code is 68PP4: our DUNS # is 96-6658028, and we have an approved DCAA accounting system. Based in Hampton Roads, Peregrine was founded in 2011 to meet the expanding requirements of Cyber offense/defense activities, including full-spectrum Information Operations (IO) and security engineering.
Rights & Usage
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
© Copyright 2014
Request Permissions
Which statement best describes the authority of the president has in time of war or national emergency?
Inherent powers are those that presidents claim that are not expressed in the Constitution but are inferred from it; they are most often asserted during times of war or national emergency.Which statement best describes the limitation of tactical control Tacon )?
Which statement best describes the limitation of Tactical Control (TACON)? Command authority in an international operation will be linked to the mission authority.When a disaster strikes which agency or entity may assume the role?
When a disaster is declared, the Federal government, led by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), responds the request of, and in support of, States, Tribes, Territories, and Insular Areas and local jurisdictions impacted by a disaster.Which statement describes what correct decision on the use of force require?
Correct decisions on use of force require a solid understanding of the situation, mission, and commander's guidance and intent. In some cases, these may dictate restraint rather than using force. U.S. commanders always have the authority and responsibility to use force as necessary in unit self-defense. Tải thêm tài liệu liên quan đến nội dung bài viết Legitimacy in the end states means that the results of a military operation will be just.
Post a Comment